THE FOREST AND PESTICIDES
October 16, 2015
Assorted notes from
the winter of 2014-2015, not complete coverage of the subject.
The 1970 Canadian Government spraying for Spruce Budworm
used organophosphate Fenitrothion on tens of thousands of acres of New
Brunswick which just happened to be in Blueberry areas. The Bumblebees were killed. The area’s
Blueberry production took years to recover. Nearby Nova Scotia did not spray,
lost no Bumblebees and kept their Blueberry production
Subject: saving Northern Ontario from Chemical Contamination
8/23/2007, National Aboriginal Association,
Ottawa.
“A number of individuals have joined together requesting
that government agencies including:
The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, OMNR; Provincial and Federal Ministries of
Environment; Ministry of Fisheries and
Oceans; and The Environmental Commission of Ontario, take appropriate steps to sample
water quality before and after herbicide applications expected to occur in
Northern Ontario during the summer of 2007.
“
‘Currently such testing is not routinely performed.”
The letter goes on to say that at that time, 2007, “the
issue of herbicide application is one which is non-negotiable with the
companies.”
The NAFA (National Aboriginal
Forestry Association) believes it is for” financial reasons alone” that the
companies do not use other “ tools” to manage the vegetation.
The NAFA states, “ The residents in Northern Ontario are
literally being exposed to toxic chemicals “ (banned elsewhere) “ for the sake
of increasing shareholders profits.”
The letter goes on to say: “If this notion bothers you…express your opinion.”
“ It is important to remember that this environmental
degradation affects First Nations, Metis and all other communities in Northern
Ontario alike. No one should feel
excluded or immune from this chemical contamination of air, water , fish and
wildlife.
“The Report submitted in July 2007 cites empirical evidence
indicative that spray drift is routinely exceeding the currently required
buffer zones for herbicide application.
In addition to risks of herbicide entering the waterways by spray drift,
evidence is mounting that groundwater may also become contaminated, later
mixing with surface water holding fish.”
“In Northern Ontario (2007) the two main herbicides being
used include glyphosate and 2,4-D as their base chemical, Round-Up and Killex
respectively. Evidence of glyphosate contaminating ground water in Cochrane,
Ontario, is consistent with findings in European countries such as Denmark.
2,4-D ground water contamination is well recognized globally.”
According to Lorraine A. Rekmans, the Aboriginal Affairs
Advocate for the Green Party of Canada,
“ The systematic application of chemical herbicides in Ontario and the
contamination of waterways is in violation of The Treaties signed with the
original peoples of Ontario and impacts directly on basic human rights to
healthy food sources. This is a
violation of our Constitutionally protected rights as Aboriginal Peoples. In fact a violation of all people’s
rights. As a member of Confederation,
Ontario has to take its responsibility to uphold treaties seriously.”
SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS
“ Notably, study
of the synergistic effects of 2,4-D and glyphosate mixtures, either intentional
or unintentional, is not required by governments in Canada, and thus testing of
synergistic impacts is limited.” Pg. 7
DRIFT
“Glyphosate drift-damage is likely to be much more extensive
and more persistent than with many other herbicides.” Pg 8 “This herbicide can be extensively mobile in
the soil…” Run-off into the water.
HEALTH
Continued herbicide use will result in significant
contamination with human health implications.
“Numerous laboratory studies have shown the ability of
glyphosate and glyphosate containing herbicide products to cause genetic
damage.”
“In the specific study examined, Round-Up, and its active
ingredient glyphosate, were tested in the same battery of assays for the
induction of DNA damage and chromosomal effects invivo and in vitro.”
Damage was noted in mice – bone marrow, lover and kidney.
“Furthermore, when testing the effects of the pesticide
compounds on human lymphocytes it was shown that after treatment, both
glyphosate and Round-Up significantly induced Chromatid exchanges. These
chromatid exchanges could result in mutagenic effects.”
“In addition, glyphosate has also been proven to have
carcinogenetic effects.” “Three studies found a link between glyphosate
exposure and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.”
“Furthermore, another study from the University of Minnesota
demonstrates that both glyphosate and Round-Up caused a rapid increase in cell
division in human breast cancer cells.”
“Furthermore, glyphosate exposure has been linked to
increased risk of pregnancy problems, but the mechanism of action in mammals is
questionable.”
Joel Theriault, White Moose petition –re the earlier request for water quality testing:
Petition rejected by Government due to lack of documentation
of Glyphosate in Water, 2007.
The White Moose site has much of Joel Theriaults’ earlier
writings re pesticides.
After the final rejection by the government Joel
Theriault now works in the legal
department of EcoJustice and stays away from pesticides.
The current herbicide used in Canada forestry cornering 90%
of the market is Glyphosate.
100,000 (one hundred thousand) hectares treated annually in Ontario
predominantly areal spray.
Glyphosate, aka:
Round-Up
Roundup original
Round-up Biactive
Vision
Vision Max
Weather Max
Touchdown, and
Catena.
Glyph formulations with inert ingredient POEA are highly
toxic to many larval amphibian species.
Inert ingredients are not toxic to plants.
Since chemical formulas are usually secret they (the
companies) are not required to list inert ingredients.
As the article I was reading says, any good lab can analyze
the product and tell what’s in it. The
only people kept in the dark are the general public.