THE WAR ON WEEDS AND INSECTS
PESTICIDES 2
Should we be surprised to read that left-over chemical
weapon stocks of WWII were converted “en masse” to herbicides? (It’s all in the wording POST)
I was.
I had lived with the assumption “destroy” meant destroy.
2,4 – D was introduced in 1945. It was,
and still is, the most widely used synthetic organic chemical.
2,4 – D is a herbicide that accelerates growth.
2,4 -DB won’t affect the field crops.
However, weeds have “enzymatic versatility” – they change
2,4 -DB and convert it to 2,4 -D and grow themselves to death.
Forward 60 years –
Quebec vs Dow
(Agrosciences) : trying to get a re-evaluation of 2, 4 -D. (Dow Agrosciences – organized under the laws
of the State of Delaware, head office: Indianapolis, Indiana )
Decision, May 16, 2008:
“The Government of Quebec agrees that products containing
2,4 – D do not pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment,
provided that the instructions on their label are followed – as concluded by
Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA)”
It’s all in the
wording
PESTICIDE RISK FACTORS:
Chronic toxicity
Dermal toxicity
Plant surface half life
Soil half life
Mode of action
Systemic absorption in plants
Leaching potential
Fish toxicity
Run-off potential
Bird toxicity
Bee toxicity
Beneficial arthropod toxicity
By the late ‘60’s organic phosphate pesticides had been used
long enough for the Federal Aviation Agency (U.S.) to make a study relating to
human health.
Besides mental disturbances, the study found chronic
exposure to pesticides is associated with:
Anxiety
Uneasiness
Giddiness
Insomnia
Somnambulism
Lassitude
Drowsiness
Tinnitus
Nystagmus
Dizziness
Pyrexia
Paralysis
Paresthesias
Polyneuritis
Mental confusion
Emotional lability
Depression with weeping
Schizophrenic reactions
Dissociation
Fugue
Inability to get along with friends and family
Poor work performance.
PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS
ACT (S.C. 2002 c 28) defines
“acceptable risk” as risk for which there is reasonable certainty that no harm
to human health, future generations or the environment will result from
exposure to or use of the product taking into account its conditions or
proposed conditions of registration.
A Known “Killer” is Approved
When the U.S. E.P.A. (Environmental protection Agency)
approved the registration of the neonicotinoid pesticides in the mid 1990’s it
was right there in the submitted documents – that neonicotinoids were toxic
to BEES as well as Earthworms and Terrestrial and Aquatic Invertebrates.
Neonicotinoids were first registered for use on corn in
2001.
Health Canada reports: “The mass deaths of Ontario and
Quebec bees in 2012, showed 75% of the Ontario bees tested positive for
neonicotinoids.”
These bee deaths were linked to treated corn and soybeans
planted in the area.
Bayer Crop Science says “No bees died with neonicotinoids.”
In 2012 Canada lost 200,000 (two hundred thousand)
colonies of bees.
Bayer Crop Science says,” There is not a correlation with
the use of these products and the loss
of the colonies.”
Pesticide manufacturers – Bayer Crop Science and Syngenta
and CropLife America – say:
“Neonicotinoids are safe – if used as directed”. (It’s all in the wording.)
“They have tests that prove risks to bees and “non-target”
insects are minimal.”
September 4, 2014 The
Chronicle –Journal, Thunder Bay, Ontario
The Canadian Press report: “Bee Death Lawsuit proposal”
A class-action lawsuit to “recover significant losses and
damage that were suffered by Canadian Beekeepers due to the widespread use of
neonicotinoid pesticides.”
The allegations were that Bayer Inc and Sergenta
International AG were “negligent in their development and distribution of
neonicotinoids, as well as permitting , and failing to prevent, damages to
beekeepers.”
Also noted in the Statement of Claim: - several
neonicotinoid products produced by these companies have received conditional
approvals from our Federal Government.